IVV vs TRIO
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TRIO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.70% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $124M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 3 | |
| YTD Return | +14.29% | +8.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.79% | +3.41% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.19% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 9.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -11.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | McCarthy & Cox | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 5, 2025 |
IVV vs TRIO Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF (TRIO) is a ETF from McCarthy & Cox. Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% while TRIO returned +3.41%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.29% versus a gain of 8.25% for TRIO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 9.3% for TRIO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -11.1% for TRIO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TRIO charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $70 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.00% for TRIO.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and TRIO share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TRIO?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TRIO charges 0.70%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $67 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or TRIO?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% vs +3.41% for TRIO, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +7.06% vs +7.81% for TRIO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or TRIO?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 9.3% for TRIO. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TRIO -11.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and TRIO?
IVV and TRIO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TRIO?
IVV and TRIO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TRIO?
IVV yields 1.10% while TRIO yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.