IVV vs TSIB
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Direxion TSLA Defined Income Boost ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. TSIB delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TSIB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.97% | |
| AUM | $886.7B | $2M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 3 | |
| YTD Return | +12.92% | +22.62% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.22% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.95% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.76% | +24.89% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 115.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -4.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 29, 2026 |
IVV vs TSIB Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Direxion TSLA Defined Income Boost ETF (TSIB) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +21.22% while TSIB returned +22.62%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.92% versus a gain of 22.62% for TSIB.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TSIB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 115.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -4.5% for TSIB. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.01. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TSIB charges 0.97%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $97 annually, a gap of $94 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.00% for TSIB.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and TSIB share 1 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in TSIB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TSLA | 1.36% | 11.48% | 10.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TSIB?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TSIB charges 0.97%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $94 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or TSIB?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.22% vs +22.62% for TSIB, so TSIB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +22.83% for TSIB. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or TSIB?
TSIB has been the more volatile fund at 115.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TSIB -4.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and TSIB?
IVV and TSIB have a monthly-return correlation of 0.01, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TSIB?
IVV and TSIB share 1 common holdings with a 1.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TSIB?
IVV yields 1.10% while TSIB yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.