IVV vs TSLW
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TSLW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.99% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $72M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 121.28% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 5 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | -38.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.94% | -14.29% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.81% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 59.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -54.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Roundhill Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 19, 2025 |
IVV vs TSLW Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay ETF (TSLW) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% while TSLW returned -14.29%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.28% versus a loss of 38.80% for TSLW.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TSLW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 59.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -54.3% for TSLW. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.43. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TSLW charges 0.99%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $99 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 121.28% for TSLW.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and TSLW share 1 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in TSLW | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TSLA | 1.65% | 19.90% | 18.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TSLW?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TSLW charges 0.99%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $96 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or TSLW?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% vs -14.29% for TSLW, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs -8.00% for TSLW. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or TSLW?
TSLW has been the more volatile fund at 59.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TSLW -54.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and TSLW?
IVV and TSLW have a monthly-return correlation of 0.43, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TSLW?
IVV and TSLW share 1 common holdings with a 1.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TSLW?
IVV yields 1.10% while TSLW yields 121.28%, so TSLW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.