IVV vs TSMU
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. TSMU delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TSMU | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.50% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $63M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 2 | |
| YTD Return | +14.29% | +45.09% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.79% | +131.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.19% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 73.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -63.7% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | GraniteShares | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 11, 2024 |
IVV vs TSMU Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMU) is a ETF from GraniteShares. Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% while TSMU returned +131.23%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.29% versus a gain of 45.09% for TSMU.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TSMU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 73.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -63.7% for TSMU. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TSMU charges 1.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $150 annually, a gap of $147 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.00% for TSMU.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and TSMU share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TSMU?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TSMU charges 1.50%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $147 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or TSMU?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% vs +131.23% for TSMU, so TSMU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.06% vs +83.00% for TSMU. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or TSMU?
TSMU has been the more volatile fund at 73.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TSMU -63.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and TSMU?
IVV and TSMU have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TSMU?
IVV and TSMU share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TSMU?
IVV yields 1.10% while TSMU yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.