IVV vs UBOT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Direxion Daily Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 2X ETF
Which is better, IVV or UBOT?
Large Cap Blend against Trading-Leveraged Equity.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | UBOT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.32% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $23M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 508 | 8 |
| YTD Return | +12.01%Best | -18.40% |
| 1Y Return | +16.48%Best | -9.37% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.21%Best | +8.72% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.95%Best | -15.74% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.5%Best | 59.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -86.1% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,384Best | $4,247 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Direxion Shares ETF Trust |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Trading-Leveraged Equity |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 19, 2018 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 19, 2018 to Sep 14, 2026 (8.4 years).
IVV vs UBOT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.4 years both funds cover.
IVV vs UBOT Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Direxion Daily Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 2X ETF (UBOT) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +16.48% while UBOT returned -9.37%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.01% versus a loss of 18.40% for UBOT.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.21% per year against +8.72% for UBOT; over five years the annualized figures are +12.95% and -15.74% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +14.18% annualized vs -8.93%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
UBOT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 59.9% compared with 16.5% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -86.1% for UBOT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while UBOT charges 1.32%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $132 annually, a gap of $129 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.10% for UBOT.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 490 holdings in IVV and 3 in UBOT, totalling 99.3% and 98.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 3 in UBOT, against full books of 508 and 8.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and UBOT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or UBOT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while UBOT charges 1.32%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $129 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or UBOT?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.48% vs -9.37% for UBOT, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), IVV annualized +14.18% vs -8.93% for UBOT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or UBOT?
UBOT has been the more volatile fund at 59.9% annualized versus 16.5% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs UBOT -86.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and UBOT?
IVV and UBOT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or UBOT?
IVV yields 1.06% while UBOT yields 1.10%, so UBOT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is UBOT better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.