IVV vs UBR
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs ProShares Ultra MSCI Brazil Capped
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. UBR delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | UBR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.95% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $3M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.56% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 6 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +11.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +54.60% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | +6.91% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | +1.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 62.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -97.2% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | ProShares | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 27, 2010 |
IVV vs UBR Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and ProShares Ultra MSCI Brazil Capped (UBR) is a ETF from ProShares. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while UBR returned +54.60%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 11.27% for UBR.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.08% per year against +6.91% for UBR; over five years the annualized figures are +12.96% and +1.44% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.00% annualized vs -14.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
UBR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 62.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -97.2% for UBR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while UBR charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $95 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 1.56% for UBR.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or UBR?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while UBR charges 0.95%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or UBR?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +54.60% for UBR, so UBR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs -14.11% for UBR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or UBR?
UBR has been the more volatile fund at 62.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs UBR -97.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and UBR?
IVV and UBR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or UBR?
IVV yields 1.10% while UBR yields 1.56%, so UBR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.