IVV vs UX
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Roundhill Uranium ETF
Which is better, IVV or UX?
Large Cap Blend against Commodities.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | UX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.77% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $5M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.87% |
| Holdings | 508 | 6 |
| YTD Return | +14.14%Best | -4.54% |
| 1Y Return | +17.30%Best | -5.10% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.04% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.63% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8%Best | 31.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -26.1% |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $13,016Best | $11,058 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Roundhill Investments |
| Category | Equity | Commodity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Commodities |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 29, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 29, 2025 to Sep 22, 2026 (1.6 years).
IVV vs UX growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
IVV vs UX Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Roundhill Uranium ETF (UX) is an ETF from Roundhill Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +17.30% while UX returned -5.10%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.14% versus a loss of 4.54% for UX.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
UX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.5% compared with 12.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -26.1% for UX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.33. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while UX charges 0.77%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $77 annually, a gap of $74 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.87% for UX.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 490 holdings in IVV and 2 in UX, totalling 99.3% and 3.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 2 in UX, against full books of 508 and 6.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and UX you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or UX?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while UX charges 0.77%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $74 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or UX?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.30% vs -5.10% for UX, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +17.91% vs +6.49% for UX. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or UX?
UX has been the more volatile fund at 31.5% annualized versus 12.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs UX -26.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and UX?
IVV and UX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.33, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or UX?
IVV yields 1.06% while UX yields 0.87%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is UX better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.