IVV vs UX
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Roundhill Uranium ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | UX | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.75% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $5M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 7 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | -4.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | +12.78% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 31.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -26.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Roundhill Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Commodity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 29, 2025 |
IVV vs UX Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Roundhill Uranium ETF (UX) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while UX returned +12.78%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a loss of 4.23% for UX.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
UX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -26.1% for UX. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.33. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while UX charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for UX.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and UX share 0 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or UX?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while UX charges 0.75%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or UX?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs +12.78% for UX, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +7.23% for UX. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or UX?
UX has been the more volatile fund at 31.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs UX -26.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and UX?
IVV and UX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.33, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and UX?
IVV and UX share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or UX?
IVV yields 1.09% while UX yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.