IVV vs UYM
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs ProShares Ultra Materials
Which is better, IVV or UYM?
Large Cap Blend against Multi Alternative.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, UYM over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | UYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.95% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $40M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.09% |
| Holdings | 508 | 31 |
| YTD Return | +11.03% | +13.96%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.62% | +17.14%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.81%Best | +8.96% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.61%Best | +5.24% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.5%Best | 45.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5%Best | -92.8% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,109Best | $12,909 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | ProShares |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 30, 2007 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 1, 2007 to Sep 16, 2026 (19.6 years).
IVV vs UYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.6 years both funds cover.
IVV vs UYM Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and ProShares Ultra Materials (UYM) is an ETF from ProShares. Over the past year IVV returned +15.62% while UYM returned +17.14%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.03% versus a gain of 13.96% for UYM.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.81% per year against +8.96% for UYM; over five years the annualized figures are +12.61% and +5.24% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +9.22% annualized vs +2.56%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
UYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 45.6% compared with 15.5% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -92.8% for UYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while UYM charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $95 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.09% for UYM.
Holdings Overlap
At least 1.7% of IVV's money is in holdings UYM also owns.
Stated as a floor: for UYM, our book for it covers 69.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
IVV and UYM share little of their money.
24 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 26 in UYM, against full books of 508 and 31.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in UYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares | 0.34% | 9.14% | 8.80% |
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 0.20% | 5.44% | 5.24% |
| FCXFreeport-mcmoran Copper & Gold Inc. | 0.16% | 4.40% | 4.24% |
| CTVACorteva Inc Ctva | 0.09% | 3.41% | 3.32% |
| SHWSherwin Williams Co/the | 0.12% | 3.35% | 3.23% |
| APDAir Products & Chemicals Inc. | 0.10% | 3.36% | 3.26% |
| ECLEcolab, Inc. | 0.11% | 3.31% | 3.20% |
| NUENucor Corp. | 0.09% | 2.99% | 2.90% |
| VMCVulcan Materials Co. | 0.05% | 2.97% | 2.92% |
| MLMMartin Marietta Materials Inc. | 0.05% | 2.81% | 2.76% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and UYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or UYM?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while UYM charges 0.95%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or UYM?
Over the past year IVV returned +15.62% vs +17.14% for UYM, so UYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IVV annualized +9.22% vs +2.56% for UYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or UYM?
UYM has been the more volatile fund at 45.6% annualized versus 15.5% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs UYM -92.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and UYM?
IVV and UYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and UYM?
At least 1.7% of IVV's money is in holdings UYM also owns. Our book for UYM is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 24 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 26 in UYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or UYM?
IVV yields 1.06% while UYM yields 1.09%, so UYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is UYM better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, UYM over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.