IVV vs VNLA
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF
Which is better, IVV or VNLA?
Large Cap Blend against Short Term Bond.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | VNLA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.23% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $3.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 5.14% |
| Holdings | 508 | 386 |
| YTD Return | +11.03%Best | +2.27% |
| 1Y Return | +15.62%Best | +3.77% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.81%Best | +5.51% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.61%Best | +3.95% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.5% | 1.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9% | -4.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,109Best | $12,137 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Janus Henderson Investors |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Short Term Bond |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 16, 2016 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 17, 2016 to Sep 16, 2026 (9.8 years).
IVV vs VNLA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs VNLA Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) is an ETF from Janus Henderson Investors. Over the past year IVV returned +15.62% while VNLA returned +3.77%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.03% versus a gain of 2.27% for VNLA.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.81% per year against +5.51% for VNLA; over five years the annualized figures are +12.61% and +3.95% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +14.29% annualized vs +2.08%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 1.5% for VNLA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -4.7% for VNLA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while VNLA charges 0.23%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $23 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 5.14% for VNLA.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 490 holdings in IVV and 202 in VNLA, totalling 99.3% and 51.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 202 in VNLA, against full books of 508 and 386.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and VNLA you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or VNLA?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VNLA charges 0.23%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or VNLA?
Over the past year IVV returned +15.62% vs +3.77% for VNLA, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), IVV annualized +14.29% vs +2.08% for VNLA. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or VNLA?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 1.5% for VNLA. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs VNLA -4.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and VNLA?
IVV and VNLA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or VNLA?
IVV yields 1.06% while VNLA yields 5.14%, so VNLA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VNLA better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.