IVV vs VRTL
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF
Which is better, IVV or VRTL?
Large Cap Blend against Trading-Leveraged Equity.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, VRTL over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | VRTL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.50% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $44M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 2 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9%Best | 122.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -47.6%Best | -63.8% |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $6,442Best | $5,868 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | GraniteShares |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Trading-Leveraged Equity |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 25, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 6468 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. IVV has data through Sep 18, 2026 and VRTL through Jan 2, 2009.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 2, 2008 to Jan 2, 2009 (1 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VRTL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 122.1% compared with 21.9% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -47.6% for IVV and -63.8% for VRTL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.32. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while VRTL charges 1.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $150 annually, a gap of $147 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for VRTL.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and VRTL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or VRTL?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VRTL charges 1.50%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $147 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, IVV or VRTL?
VRTL has been the more volatile fund at 122.1% annualized versus 21.9% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -47.6% vs VRTL -63.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and VRTL?
IVV and VRTL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.32, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or VRTL?
IVV yields 1.06% while VRTL yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VRTL better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, VRTL over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.