IVV vs VTWV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
Which is better, IVV or VTWV?
Large Cap Blend against Small Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, VTWV over 1Y. VTWV is less concentrated, with 5.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | VTWV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.06% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $1.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.60% |
| Holdings | 508 | 1,432 |
| YTD Return | +12.24% | +21.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | +18.61% | +28.69%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.98%Best | +18.54% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.76%Best | +8.65% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1%Best | 19.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -47.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,230Best | $15,141 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9% | 5.6%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Small Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 20, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 22, 2010 to Sep 9, 2026 (16 years).
IVV vs VTWV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.
IVV vs VTWV Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IVV returned +18.61% while VTWV returned +28.69%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.24% versus a gain of 21.59% for VTWV.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.98% per year against +18.54% for VTWV; over five years the annualized figures are +12.76% and +8.65% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.19% annualized vs +9.42%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTWV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.4% compared with 14.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -47.3% for VTWV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while VTWV charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $6 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.60% for VTWV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 505 holdings in IVV and 1,419 in VTWV, totalling 100.0% and 100.0% of the two funds. That is not enough of VTWV to divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 1 positions appear in both.
1 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 1,419 in VTWV, against full books of 508 and 1,432.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,247 positions for VTWV that do not appear in our book for IVV (96.2% of the fund), and 495 for IVV that do not appear in VTWV (99.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in VTWV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AOSAo Smith Corp. | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and VTWV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or VTWV?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VTWV charges 0.06%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or VTWV?
Over the past year IVV returned +18.61% vs +28.69% for VTWV, so VTWV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), IVV annualized +13.19% vs +9.42% for VTWV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or VTWV?
VTWV has been the more volatile fund at 19.4% annualized versus 14.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs VTWV -47.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and VTWV?
IVV and VTWV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or VTWV?
IVV yields 1.06% while VTWV yields 1.60%, so VTWV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTWV better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, VTWV over 1Y. VTWV is less concentrated, with 5.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.