IVV vs WINC
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Western Asset Short Duration Income ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | WINC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.29% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $12M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 4.42% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 128 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | +3.43% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | +4.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | +4.92% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | +2.48% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 16.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -32.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 7, 2019 |
IVV vs WINC Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Western Asset Short Duration Income ETF (WINC) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while WINC returned +4.87%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a gain of 3.43% for WINC.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.80% per year against +4.92% for WINC; over five years the annualized figures are +13.37% and +2.48% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs +3.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WINC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -32.0% for WINC. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.23. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while WINC charges 0.29%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $29 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 4.42% for WINC.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or WINC?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WINC charges 0.29%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or WINC?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs +4.87% for WINC, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs +3.18% for WINC. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or WINC?
WINC has been the more volatile fund at 16.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs WINC -32.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and WINC?
IVV and WINC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.23, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or WINC?
IVV yields 1.09% while WINC yields 4.42%, so WINC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.