IVV vs XJAN
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs FT Vest US Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - January
Which is better, IVV or XJAN?
Large Cap Blend against Option Writing.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | XJAN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.85% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $40M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 12 |
| YTD Return | +12.39%Best | +6.31% |
| 1Y Return | +16.61%Best | +9.04% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.38% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.51% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.0% | 4.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8% | -10.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.7 years | $16,434Best | $12,717 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Option Writing |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 22, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 22, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.7 years).
IVV vs XJAN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.7 years both funds cover.
IVV vs XJAN Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and FT Vest US Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - January (XJAN) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while XJAN returned +9.04%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 6.31% for XJAN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.0% compared with 4.4% for XJAN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -10.0% for XJAN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while XJAN charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $85 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for XJAN.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and XJAN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or XJAN?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XJAN charges 0.85%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $82 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or XJAN?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs +9.04% for XJAN, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or XJAN?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.0% annualized versus 4.4% for XJAN. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs XJAN -10.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and XJAN?
IVV and XJAN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or XJAN?
IVV yields 1.06% while XJAN yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XJAN better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.