IVV vs XMMO
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
Which is better, IVV or XMMO?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 5Y and the full window, XMMO over 3Y. XMMO is less concentrated, with 28.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | XMMO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.35% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $7.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.63% |
| Holdings | 508 | 77 |
| YTD Return | +12.51%Best | +8.71% |
| 1Y Return | +17.57%Best | +12.62% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.27% | +23.80%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.95%Best | +12.84% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1%Best | 27.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5%Best | -84.7% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,384Best | $18,294 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9% | 28.6%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 3, 2005 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 19, 2000 to Sep 11, 2026 (26.3 years).
IVV vs XMMO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 26.3 years both funds cover.
IVV vs XMMO Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while XMMO returned +12.62%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.51% versus a gain of 8.71% for XMMO.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.27% per year against +23.80% for XMMO; over five years the annualized figures are +12.95% and +12.84% respectively. Across the full 26-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.97% annualized vs +5.06%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XMMO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -84.7% for XMMO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while XMMO charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $35 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.63% for XMMO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 505 holdings in IVV and 76 in XMMO, totalling 100.0% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 76 in XMMO, against full books of 508 and 77.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 71 positions for XMMO that do not appear in our book for IVV (89.2% of the fund), and 495 for IVV that do not appear in XMMO (99.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and XMMO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or XMMO?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XMMO charges 0.35%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or XMMO?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs +12.62% for XMMO, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (26 years), IVV annualized +6.97% vs +5.06% for XMMO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or XMMO?
XMMO has been the more volatile fund at 27.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs XMMO -84.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and XMMO?
IVV and XMMO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or XMMO?
IVV yields 1.06% while XMMO yields 0.63%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XMMO better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 5Y and the full window, XMMO over 3Y. XMMO is less concentrated, with 28.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.