VXUS vs XMMO
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VXUS | XMMO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.05% | 0.35% | |
| AUM | $158.1B | $7.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.59% | 0.63% | |
| Holdings | 8,747 | 77 | |
| YTD Return | +14.33% | +12.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.32% | +21.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.47% | +25.32% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.72% | +14.25% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 29.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -39.9% | -84.7% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2011 | Mar 3, 2005 |
VXUS vs XMMO Performance
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year VXUS returned +25.32% while XMMO returned +21.22%. Year to date, VXUS is up 14.33% versus a gain of 12.14% for XMMO.
Over three years, VXUS compounded at +20.47% per year against +25.32% for XMMO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.72% and +14.25% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, XMMO has the edge at +7.17% annualized vs +4.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XMMO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.9% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.9% for VXUS and -84.7% for XMMO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VXUS charges 0.05% per year while XMMO charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $5 vs $35 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VXUS currently yields 2.59% against 0.63% for XMMO.
Holdings Overlap
VXUS and XMMO share 2 holdings out of 7943 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VXUS or XMMO?
VXUS has an expense ratio of 0.05% while XMMO charges 0.35%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $30 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VXUS or XMMO?
Over the past year VXUS returned +25.32% vs +21.22% for XMMO, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), VXUS annualized +4.84% vs +7.17% for XMMO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VXUS or XMMO?
XMMO has been the more volatile fund at 29.9% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: VXUS -39.9% vs XMMO -84.7%.
Should I hold both VXUS and XMMO?
VXUS and XMMO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VXUS and XMMO?
VXUS and XMMO share 2 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7943 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VXUS or XMMO?
VXUS yields 2.59% while XMMO yields 0.63%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.