IVV vs XRPC
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Canary XRP ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | XRPC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.50% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $252M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 2 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | -49.19% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | - | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | - | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -56.7% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Canary Capital Group LLC | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 13, 2025 |
IVV vs XRPC Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Canary XRP ETF (XRPC) is a ETF from Canary Capital Group LLC. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a loss of 49.19% for XRPC.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -56.7% for XRPC. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while XRPC charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $50 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for XRPC.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or XRPC?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XRPC charges 0.50%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or XRPC?
IVV yields 1.09% while XRPC yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.