IVV vs YJUN
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | YJUN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.90% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $138M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 5 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +7.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.70% | +12.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.49% | +10.38% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.43% | +6.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 11.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -21.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 18, 2021 |
IVV vs YJUN Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June (YJUN) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while YJUN returned +12.22%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 7.07% for YJUN.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.49% per year against +10.38% for YJUN; over five years the annualized figures are +13.43% and +6.36% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.05% annualized vs +6.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 11.0% for YJUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -21.5% for YJUN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while YJUN charges 0.90%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $90 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for YJUN.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and YJUN share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or YJUN?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while YJUN charges 0.90%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $87 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or YJUN?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +12.22% for YJUN, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +6.33% for YJUN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or YJUN?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 11.0% for YJUN. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs YJUN -21.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and YJUN?
IVV and YJUN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and YJUN?
IVV and YJUN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or YJUN?
IVV yields 1.09% while YJUN yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.