IVV vs ZCBF
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2034 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | ZCBF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.07% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $970,301.99 | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 2.09% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 6 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | -1.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.94% | - | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.81% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | - | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -4.7% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Global X by mirae Asset | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 6, 2026 |
IVV vs ZCBF Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2034 ETF (ZCBF) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Year to date, IVV is up 12.28% versus a loss of 1.28% for ZCBF.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -4.7% for ZCBF. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while ZCBF charges 0.07%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $7 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 2.09% for ZCBF.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or ZCBF?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while ZCBF charges 0.07%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $4 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or ZCBF?
IVV yields 1.10% while ZCBF yields 2.09%, so ZCBF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.