IVV vs ZROZ
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Exchange-Traded Fund
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | ZROZ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.15% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $1.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 5.52% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 23 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | -6.97% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | -4.97% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | -5.56% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | -14.69% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 21.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -63.7% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | PIMCO (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 30, 2009 |
IVV vs ZROZ Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and PIMCO 25+ Year Zero Coupon US Treasury Index Exchange-Traded Fund (ZROZ) is a ETF from PIMCO (US). Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while ZROZ returned -4.97%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a loss of 6.97% for ZROZ.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.08% per year against -5.56% for ZROZ; over five years the annualized figures are +12.96% and -14.69% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.00% annualized vs -0.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ZROZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -63.7% for ZROZ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.11. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while ZROZ charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $15 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 5.52% for ZROZ.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and ZROZ share 0 holdings out of 523 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or ZROZ?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while ZROZ charges 0.15%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or ZROZ?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs -4.97% for ZROZ, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs -0.31% for ZROZ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or ZROZ?
ZROZ has been the more volatile fund at 21.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs ZROZ -63.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and ZROZ?
IVV and ZROZ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.11, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and ZROZ?
IVV and ZROZ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 523 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or ZROZ?
IVV yields 1.10% while ZROZ yields 5.52%, so ZROZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.