IZRL vs SPGM
ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
SPGM has a lower expense ratio. SPGM delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPGM offers more diversification with 2,985 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IZRL | SPGM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $137M | $1.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.63% | 1.81% | |
| Holdings | 67 | 2,985 | |
| YTD Return | -4.16% | +13.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.19% | +24.44% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.16% | +21.66% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.04% | +11.73% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.5% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -60.0% | -34.0% | |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 4, 2017 | Feb 27, 2012 |
IZRL vs SPGM Performance
ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF (IZRL) is a ETF from Ark Invest and State Street SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors. Over the past year IZRL returned +8.19% while SPGM returned +24.44%. Year to date, IZRL is down 4.16% versus a gain of 13.82% for SPGM.
Over three years, IZRL compounded at +15.16% per year against +21.66% for SPGM; over five years the annualized figures are -0.04% and +11.73% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, SPGM has the edge at +9.83% annualized vs +4.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IZRL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.5% compared with 13.6% for SPGM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -60.0% for IZRL and -34.0% for SPGM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IZRL charges 0.49% per year while SPGM charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $9 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IZRL currently yields 2.63% against 1.81% for SPGM.
Holdings Overlap
IZRL and SPGM share 13 holdings out of 2899 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IZRL or SPGM?
IZRL has an expense ratio of 0.49% while SPGM charges 0.09%. SPGM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $40 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IZRL or SPGM?
Over the past year IZRL returned +8.19% vs +24.44% for SPGM, so SPGM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), IZRL annualized +4.95% vs +9.83% for SPGM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IZRL or SPGM?
IZRL has been the more volatile fund at 23.5% annualized versus 13.6% for SPGM. Worst drawdown: IZRL -60.0% vs SPGM -34.0%.
Should I hold both IZRL and SPGM?
IZRL and SPGM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IZRL and SPGM?
IZRL and SPGM share 13 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2899 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IZRL or SPGM?
IZRL yields 2.63% while SPGM yields 1.81%, so IZRL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.