JANP vs PMAR
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - January vs Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - March
Which is better, JANP or PMAR?
JANP has been ahead.
JANP has a lower expense ratio. JANP led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JANP | PMAR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50%Best | 0.79% |
| AUM | $52M | $746M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 14 | 18 |
| YTD Return | +10.23%Best | +9.57% |
| 1Y Return | +13.93%Best | +12.36% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.29% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.77% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.3% | 5.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -12.2% | -9.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.8 years | $14,503Best | $13,872 |
| Fund Family | PGIM Investments | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Dec 29, 2023 | Mar 2, 2020 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 2, 2024 to Oct 13, 2026 (2.8 years).
JANP vs PMAR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.8 years both funds cover.
JANP vs PMAR Performance
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - January (JANP) is an ETF from PGIM Investments and Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year JANP returned +13.93% while PMAR returned +12.36%. Year to date, JANP is up 10.23% versus a gain of 9.57% for PMAR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JANP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.3% compared with 5.3% for PMAR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.2% for JANP and -9.3% for PMAR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JANP charges 0.50% per year while PMAR charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $79 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JANP currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for PMAR.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of JANP and PMAR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JANP or PMAR?
JANP has an expense ratio of 0.50% while PMAR charges 0.79%. JANP is the cheaper option, by $29 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, JANP or PMAR?
Over the past year JANP returned +13.93% vs +12.36% for PMAR, so JANP leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, JANP or PMAR?
JANP has been the more volatile fund at 6.3% annualized versus 5.3% for PMAR. Worst drawdown: JANP -12.2% vs PMAR -9.3%.
Should I hold both JANP and PMAR?
JANP and PMAR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, JANP or PMAR?
JANP yields 0.00% while PMAR yields 0.00%, so PMAR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PMAR better than JANP?
JANP has a lower expense ratio. JANP led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.