PMAR vs VXUS
PMAR vs VXUS
Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - March vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PMAR | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $764M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +8.11% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.59% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.73% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.55% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.2% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 2, 2020 | Jan 26, 2011 |
PMAR vs VXUS Performance
Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PMAR returned +13.59% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, PMAR is up 8.11% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, PMAR compounded at +12.73% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +9.55% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, PMAR has the edge at +9.79% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 7.1% for PMAR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.2% for PMAR and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PMAR charges 0.79% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $5 annually, a gap of $74 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PMAR currently yields 0.00% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PMAR or VXUS?
PMAR has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $74 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PMAR or VXUS?
Over the past year PMAR returned +13.59% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), PMAR annualized +9.79% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PMAR or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 7.1% for PMAR. Worst drawdown: PMAR -17.2% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both PMAR and VXUS?
PMAR and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, PMAR or VXUS?
PMAR yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.