JGH vs VTI
Nuveen Global High Income Fund vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JGH | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 3.73% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | - | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 9.15% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 386 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +4.37% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.26% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.61% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.83% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -48.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Nuveen | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 24, 2014 | May 24, 2001 |
JGH vs VTI Performance
Nuveen Global High Income Fund (JGH) is a ETF from Nuveen and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year JGH returned +1.26% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, JGH is up 4.37% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, JGH compounded at +13.61% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +4.83% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs +1.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JGH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.1% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -48.9% for JGH and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JGH charges 3.73% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $373 vs $3 annually, a gap of $370 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JGH currently yields 9.15% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
JGH and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2801 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JGH or VTI?
JGH has an expense ratio of 3.73% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $370 per year of difference.
Which performed better, JGH or VTI?
Over the past year JGH returned +1.26% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), JGH annualized +1.31% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, JGH or VTI?
JGH has been the more volatile fund at 16.1% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: JGH -48.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both JGH and VTI?
JGH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between JGH and VTI?
JGH and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2801 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, JGH or VTI?
JGH yields 9.15% while VTI yields 1.07%, so JGH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.