JHMU vs QQQ
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. JHMU offers more diversification with 217 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JHMU | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $44M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.86% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 217 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +0.81% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.31% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.9% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -4.5% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | John Hancock Investment Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 1, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
JHMU vs QQQ Performance
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF (JHMU) is a ETF from John Hancock Investment Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year JHMU returned +5.31% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, JHMU is up 0.81% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 3.9% for JHMU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.5% for JHMU and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JHMU charges 0.39% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $18 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JHMU currently yields 3.86% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
JHMU and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 220 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JHMU or QQQ?
JHMU has an expense ratio of 0.39% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $21 per year of difference.
Which performed better, JHMU or QQQ?
Over the past year JHMU returned +5.31% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), JHMU annualized +6.25% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, JHMU or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 3.9% for JHMU. Worst drawdown: JHMU -4.5% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both JHMU and QQQ?
JHMU and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between JHMU and QQQ?
JHMU and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 220 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, JHMU or QQQ?
JHMU yields 3.86% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so JHMU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.