JLS vs VYM

JLS vs VYM

Which is better, JLS or VYM?

Diversified Sectoral Bond against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricJLSVYM
Expense Ratio1.62%0.04%Best
AUM-$81.6B
Dividend Yield9.79%2.24%
Holdings148613
YTD Return-0.64%+14.82%Best
1Y Return-1.34%+20.84%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+11.74%+18.64%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+4.48%+12.28%Best
Volatility (annualized)10.7%Best13.1%
Max Drawdown-51.2%-35.7%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$12,450$17,845Best
Fund FamilyNuveenVanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
StyleDiversified Sectoral BondLarge Cap Value
InceptionNov 25, 2009Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 25, 2009 to Sep 4, 2026 (16.8 years).

JLS vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16.8 years both funds cover.

JLS vs VYM Performance

Nuveen Mortgage and Income Fund (JLS) is an ETF from Nuveen and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year JLS returned -1.34% while VYM returned +20.84%. Year to date, JLS is down 0.64% versus a gain of 14.82% for VYM.

Over three years, JLS compounded at +11.74% per year against +18.64% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +4.48% and +12.28% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +10.11% annualized vs +0.44%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.1% compared with 10.7% for JLS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.2% for JLS and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

JLS charges 1.62% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $162 vs $4 annually, a gap of $158 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JLS currently yields 9.79% against 2.24% for VYM.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of JLS and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

JLSVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, JLS or VYM?

JLS has an expense ratio of 1.62% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $158 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, JLS or VYM?

Over the past year JLS returned -1.34% vs +20.84% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), JLS annualized +0.44% vs +10.11% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, JLS or VYM?

VYM has been the more volatile fund at 13.1% annualized versus 10.7% for JLS. Worst drawdown: JLS -51.2% vs VYM -35.7%.

Should I hold both JLS and VYM?

JLS and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, JLS or VYM?

JLS yields 9.79% while VYM yields 2.24%, so JLS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than JLS?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.