JNUG vs VOO
Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. JNUG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JNUG | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.03% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $515M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.63% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -20.72% | +12.95% | |
| 1Y Return | +76.15% | +20.69% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +81.59% | +22.09% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +22.90% | +13.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 111.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -100.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 3, 2013 | Sep 7, 2010 |
JNUG vs VOO Performance
Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (JNUG) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year JNUG returned +76.15% while VOO returned +20.69%. Year to date, JNUG is down 20.72% versus a gain of 12.95% for VOO.
Over three years, JNUG compounded at +81.59% per year against +22.09% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +22.90% and +13.40% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.50% annualized vs -34.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JNUG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 111.8% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -100.0% for JNUG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.24. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JNUG charges 1.03% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $103 vs $3 annually, a gap of $100 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JNUG currently yields 2.63% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
JNUG and VOO share 0 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JNUG or VOO?
JNUG has an expense ratio of 1.03% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $100 per year of difference.
Which performed better, JNUG or VOO?
Over the past year JNUG returned +76.15% vs +20.69% for VOO, so JNUG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), JNUG annualized -34.45% vs +13.50% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, JNUG or VOO?
JNUG has been the more volatile fund at 111.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: JNUG -100.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both JNUG and VOO?
JNUG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.24, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between JNUG and VOO?
JNUG and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, JNUG or VOO?
JNUG yields 2.63% while VOO yields 1.08%, so JNUG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.