JPAN vs VTI
Matthews Japan Active ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. JPAN delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JPAN | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $10M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.38% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 55 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +22.12% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +29.49% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.58% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Matthews Asia Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 21, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
JPAN vs VTI Performance
Matthews Japan Active ETF (JPAN) is a ETF from Matthews Asia Funds and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year JPAN returned +29.49% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, JPAN is up 22.12% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Over three years, JPAN compounded at +24.58% per year against +21.27% for VTI. Across the full 3-year window we track, JPAN has the edge at +24.58% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 15.0% for JPAN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.2% for JPAN and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JPAN charges 0.79% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JPAN currently yields 4.38% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
JPAN and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2837 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JPAN or VTI?
JPAN has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, JPAN or VTI?
Over the past year JPAN returned +29.49% vs +22.19% for VTI, so JPAN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), JPAN annualized +24.58% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, JPAN or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 15.0% for JPAN. Worst drawdown: JPAN -15.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both JPAN and VTI?
JPAN and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between JPAN and VTI?
JPAN and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2837 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, JPAN or VTI?
JPAN yields 4.38% while VTI yields 1.07%, so JPAN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.