JPMB vs VTI
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JPMB | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $67M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.79% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 205 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +1.22% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.00% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.59% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.25% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -27.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 29, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
JPMB vs VTI Performance
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF (JPMB) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year JPMB returned +6.00% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, JPMB is up 1.22% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Over three years, JPMB compounded at +7.59% per year against +21.27% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +1.25% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs +0.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 10.1% for JPMB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.6% for JPMB and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JPMB charges 0.39% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JPMB currently yields 6.79% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
JPMB and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2862 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JPMB or VTI?
JPMB has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, JPMB or VTI?
Over the past year JPMB returned +6.00% vs +22.19% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), JPMB annualized +0.87% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, JPMB or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 10.1% for JPMB. Worst drawdown: JPMB -27.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both JPMB and VTI?
JPMB and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between JPMB and VTI?
JPMB and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2862 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, JPMB or VTI?
JPMB yields 6.79% while VTI yields 1.07%, so JPMB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.