JPXN vs VOO
iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. JPXN delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JPXN | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $142M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.74% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 394 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +16.91% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.91% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.93% | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.88% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2001 | Sep 7, 2010 |
JPXN vs VOO Performance
iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF (JPXN) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year JPXN returned +22.91% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, JPXN is up 16.91% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Over three years, JPXN compounded at +19.93% per year against +21.79% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.88% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.45% annualized vs +4.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JPXN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for JPXN and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JPXN charges 0.48% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $3 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JPXN currently yields 2.74% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
JPXN and VOO share 0 holdings out of 895 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JPXN or VOO?
JPXN has an expense ratio of 0.48% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.
Which performed better, JPXN or VOO?
Over the past year JPXN returned +22.91% vs +20.92% for VOO, so JPXN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), JPXN annualized +4.48% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, JPXN or VOO?
JPXN has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: JPXN -56.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both JPXN and VOO?
JPXN and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between JPXN and VOO?
JPXN and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 895 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, JPXN or VOO?
JPXN yields 2.74% while VOO yields 1.08%, so JPXN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.