JSI vs VYM

JSI vs VYM

Which is better, JSI or VYM?

VYM has been ahead.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricJSIVYM
Expense Ratio0.50%0.04%Best
AUM$1.5B$81.6B
Dividend Yield6.49%2.22%
Holdings588613
YTD Return+0.49%+13.91%Best
1Y Return+2.16%+17.57%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+18.12%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.17%
Volatility (annualized)2.6%Best10.2%
Max Drawdown-2.3%Best-14.5%
$10,000 over 2.8 years$11,869$17,176Best
Fund FamilyJanus Henderson InvestorsVanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
Style-Large Cap Value
InceptionNov 8, 2023Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 9, 2023 to Sep 11, 2026 (2.8 years).

JSI vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.8 years both funds cover.

JSI vs VYM Performance

Janus Henderson Securitized Income ETF (JSI) is an ETF from Janus Henderson Investors and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year JSI returned +2.16% while VYM returned +17.57%. Year to date, JSI is up 0.49% versus a gain of 13.91% for VYM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.2% compared with 2.6% for JSI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -2.3% for JSI and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

JSI charges 0.50% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $4 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JSI currently yields 6.49% against 2.22% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 129 holdings in JSI and 603 in VYM, totalling 49.0% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 129 positions we hold weights for in JSI and 603 in VYM, against full books of 588 and 613.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of JSI and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

JSIVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, JSI or VYM?

JSI has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, JSI or VYM?

Over the past year JSI returned +2.16% vs +17.57% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, JSI or VYM?

VYM has been the more volatile fund at 10.2% annualized versus 2.6% for JSI. Worst drawdown: JSI -2.3% vs VYM -14.5%.

Should I hold both JSI and VYM?

JSI and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, JSI or VYM?

JSI yields 6.49% while VYM yields 2.22%, so JSI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than JSI?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.