JUNP vs SPY

JUNP vs SPY

Which is better, JUNP or SPY?

Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.

SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90.

Lower Fees: SPYHigher Returns: SPY

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricJUNPSPY
Expense Ratio0.50%0.09%Best
AUM$94M$804.7B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.98%
Holdings8505
YTD Return+5.25%+12.22%Best
1Y Return+8.19%+16.97%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.16%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.00%
Volatility (annualized)5.9%Best11.9%
Max Drawdown-11.2%Best-18.8%
$10,000 over 2.3 years$12,895$14,868Best
Fund FamilyPGIM InvestmentsState Street Investment Management
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleMulti AlternativeLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMay 31, 2024Jan 22, 1993

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 3, 2024 to Sep 17, 2026 (2.3 years).

JUNP vs SPY growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.

JUNP vs SPY Performance

PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - June (JUNP) is an ETF from PGIM Investments and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year JUNP returned +8.19% while SPY returned +16.97%. Year to date, JUNP is up 5.25% versus a gain of 12.22% for SPY.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SPY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.9% compared with 5.9% for JUNP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.2% for JUNP and -18.8% for SPY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

JUNP charges 0.50% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $9 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JUNP currently yields 0.00% against 0.98% for SPY.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of JUNP and SPY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

JUNPSPY

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, JUNP or SPY?

JUNP has an expense ratio of 0.50% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $41 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, JUNP or SPY?

Over the past year JUNP returned +8.19% vs +16.97% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), JUNP annualized +11.69% vs +18.82% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, JUNP or SPY?

SPY has been the more volatile fund at 11.9% annualized versus 5.9% for JUNP. Worst drawdown: JUNP -11.2% vs SPY -18.8%.

Should I hold both JUNP and SPY?

JUNP and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, JUNP or SPY?

JUNP yields 0.00% while SPY yields 0.98%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SPY better than JUNP?

SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.