JUNZ vs VTI
TrueShares Structured Outcome June ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JUNZ | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $30M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.13% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +10.38% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.36% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.57% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.91% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | TrueShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | May 28, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
JUNZ vs VTI Performance
TrueShares Structured Outcome June ETF (JUNZ) is a ETF from TrueShares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year JUNZ returned +13.36% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, JUNZ is up 10.38% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Over three years, JUNZ compounded at +14.57% per year against +21.27% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.91% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, JUNZ has the edge at +9.46% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 11.4% for JUNZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.9% for JUNZ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JUNZ charges 0.79% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JUNZ currently yields 2.13% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
JUNZ and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2785 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JUNZ or VTI?
JUNZ has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, JUNZ or VTI?
Over the past year JUNZ returned +13.36% vs +22.19% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), JUNZ annualized +9.46% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, JUNZ or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 11.4% for JUNZ. Worst drawdown: JUNZ -17.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both JUNZ and VTI?
JUNZ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between JUNZ and VTI?
JUNZ and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2785 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, JUNZ or VTI?
JUNZ yields 2.13% while VTI yields 1.07%, so JUNZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.