JUNZ vs SCHD
JUNZ vs SCHD
TrueShares Structured Outcome June ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JUNZ | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $30M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.13% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +10.42% | +24.26% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.81% | +31.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.46% | +15.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.02% | +9.72% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.4% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.9% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | TrueShares | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | May 28, 2021 | Oct 20, 2011 |
JUNZ vs SCHD Performance
TrueShares Structured Outcome June ETF (JUNZ) is a ETF from TrueShares and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year JUNZ returned +14.81% while SCHD returned +31.38%. Year to date, JUNZ is up 10.42% versus a gain of 24.26% for SCHD.
Over three years, JUNZ compounded at +14.46% per year against +15.08% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +9.02% and +9.72% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.39% annualized vs +9.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 11.4% for JUNZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.9% for JUNZ and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JUNZ charges 0.79% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $6 annually, a gap of $73 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JUNZ currently yields 2.13% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
JUNZ and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 102 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JUNZ or SCHD?
JUNZ has an expense ratio of 0.79% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $73 per year of difference.
Which performed better, JUNZ or SCHD?
Over the past year JUNZ returned +14.81% vs +31.38% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), JUNZ annualized +9.49% vs +11.39% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, JUNZ or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 11.4% for JUNZ. Worst drawdown: JUNZ -17.9% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both JUNZ and SCHD?
JUNZ and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between JUNZ and SCHD?
JUNZ and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 102 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, JUNZ or SCHD?
JUNZ yields 2.13% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.