KALL vs VTI
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KALL | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $9M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.19% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 210 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +11.08% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.64% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.79% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.69% | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.1% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 12, 2015 | May 24, 2001 |
KALL vs VTI Performance
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF (KALL) is a ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KALL returned +11.64% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, KALL is up 11.08% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, KALL compounded at +2.79% per year against +21.51% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +0.69% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +1.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KALL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.1% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.3% for KALL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.35. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KALL charges 0.49% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KALL currently yields 2.19% against 1.07% for VTI.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KALL or VTI?
KALL has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KALL or VTI?
Over the past year KALL returned +11.64% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), KALL annualized +1.50% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KALL or VTI?
KALL has been the more volatile fund at 26.1% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: KALL -56.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both KALL and VTI?
KALL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.35, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, KALL or VTI?
KALL yields 2.19% while VTI yields 1.07%, so KALL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.