KAMO vs VXUS
Kensington Credit Opportunities ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, KAMO or VXUS?
VXUS costs less.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KAMO | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.92% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $107M | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.81% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 10 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | -2.04% | +13.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +22.44% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.44% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.82% |
| Fund Family | Kensington Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 16, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
KAMO vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
KAMO vs VXUS Performance
Kensington Credit Opportunities ETF (KAMO) is an ETF from Kensington Funds and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, KAMO is down 2.04% versus a gain of 13.35% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KAMO charges 0.92% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $92 vs $5 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KAMO currently yields 1.81% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 7 holdings in KAMO and 8,091 in VXUS, totalling 100.0% and 87.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 48 days apart, KAMO as of Aug 17, 2026 and VXUS as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 7 positions we hold weights for in KAMO and 8,091 in VXUS, against full books of 10 and 8,747.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of KAMO and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KAMO or VXUS?
KAMO has an expense ratio of 0.92% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $87 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, KAMO or VXUS?
KAMO yields 1.81% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than KAMO?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.