KBAB vs VTI
KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KBAB | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 159.10% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -44.44% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | -20.74% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 103.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -79.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 11, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
KBAB vs VTI Performance
KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (KBAB) is a ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KBAB returned -20.74% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, KBAB is down 44.44% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KBAB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 103.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -79.0% for KBAB and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.25. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KBAB charges 1.00% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KBAB currently yields 159.10% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
KBAB and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2784 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KBAB or VTI?
KBAB has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KBAB or VTI?
Over the past year KBAB returned -20.74% vs +22.19% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), KBAB annualized -32.29% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KBAB or VTI?
KBAB has been the more volatile fund at 103.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: KBAB -79.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both KBAB and VTI?
KBAB and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.25, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KBAB and VTI?
KBAB and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2784 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KBAB or VTI?
KBAB yields 159.10% while VTI yields 1.07%, so KBAB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.