KCCA vs VTI
KraneShares California Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KCCA | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $116M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.89% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -1.11% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +10.40% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -6.01% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -40.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 4, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
KCCA vs VTI Performance
KraneShares California Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF (KCCA) is a ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KCCA returned +10.40% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, KCCA is down 1.11% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, KCCA compounded at -6.01% per year against +21.83% for VTI. Across the full 5-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs -2.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KCCA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.9% for KCCA and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.14. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KCCA charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KCCA currently yields 2.89% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
KCCA and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2789 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KCCA or VTI?
KCCA has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KCCA or VTI?
Over the past year KCCA returned +10.40% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), KCCA annualized -2.12% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KCCA or VTI?
KCCA has been the more volatile fund at 20.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: KCCA -40.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both KCCA and VTI?
KCCA and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.14, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KCCA and VTI?
KCCA and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2789 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KCCA or VTI?
KCCA yields 2.89% while VTI yields 1.07%, so KCCA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.