KDRN vs QQQ
Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KDRN | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.57% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $1M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.34% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +1.08% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.78% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.19% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.0% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.3% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Kingsbarn Capital Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 19, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
KDRN vs QQQ Performance
Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF (KDRN) is a ETF from Kingsbarn Capital Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year KDRN returned +2.78% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, KDRN is up 1.08% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, KDRN compounded at +3.19% per year against +25.96% for QQQ. Across the full 5-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +0.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 7.0% for KDRN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.3% for KDRN and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KDRN charges 0.57% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $57 vs $18 annually, a gap of $39 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KDRN currently yields 3.34% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
KDRN and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 106 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KDRN or QQQ?
KDRN has an expense ratio of 0.57% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $39 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KDRN or QQQ?
Over the past year KDRN returned +2.78% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), KDRN annualized +0.79% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KDRN or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 7.0% for KDRN. Worst drawdown: KDRN -15.3% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both KDRN and QQQ?
KDRN and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KDRN and QQQ?
KDRN and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 106 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KDRN or QQQ?
KDRN yields 3.34% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so KDRN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.