KHYB vs VTI
KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income USD Bond ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, KHYB or VTI?
Emerging Markets Bond against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KHYB | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $15M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 9.54% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 69 | 3,542 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.1%Best | 17.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.0%Tie | -35.0%Tie |
| $10,000 over 8.3 years | $10,008 | $28,859Best |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Emerging Markets Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 26, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 16 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. KHYB has data through Oct 26, 2026 and VTI through Nov 11, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 8.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 28, 2018 to Oct 26, 2026 (8.3 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 8.1% for KHYB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.0% for KHYB and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.35. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KHYB charges 0.69% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $3 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KHYB currently yields 9.54% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in KHYB and 3,464 in VTI, totalling 1.3% and 97.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in KHYB and 3,464 in VTI, against full books of 69 and 3,542.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of KHYB and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KHYB or VTI?
KHYB has an expense ratio of 0.69% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $66 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, KHYB or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 8.1% for KHYB. Worst drawdown: KHYB -35.0% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both KHYB and VTI?
KHYB and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.35, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, KHYB or VTI?
KHYB yields 9.54% while VTI yields 1.06%, so KHYB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than KHYB?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.