KHYB vs VTI
KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income USD Bond ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KHYB | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $16M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 9.20% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 73 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +4.33% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.17% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.97% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.79% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 26, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
KHYB vs VTI Performance
KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income USD Bond ETF (KHYB) is a ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KHYB returned +8.17% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, KHYB is up 4.33% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, KHYB compounded at +10.97% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +0.79% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs +0.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 8.2% for KHYB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.0% for KHYB and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.35. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KHYB charges 0.69% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $3 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KHYB currently yields 9.20% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
KHYB and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KHYB or VTI?
KHYB has an expense ratio of 0.69% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $66 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KHYB or VTI?
Over the past year KHYB returned +8.17% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), KHYB annualized +0.20% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KHYB or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 8.2% for KHYB. Worst drawdown: KHYB -35.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both KHYB and VTI?
KHYB and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.35, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KHYB and VTI?
KHYB and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KHYB or VTI?
KHYB yields 9.20% while VTI yields 1.07%, so KHYB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.