IVV vs KHYB
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income USD Bond ETF
Which is better, IVV or KHYB?
Large Cap Blend against Emerging Markets Bond.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | KHYB |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.69% |
| AUM | $850.0B | $15M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 9.54% |
| Holdings | 1,018 | 69 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.6% | 8.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -35.0% |
| $10,000 over 8.3 years | $30,390Best | $10,008 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | KraneShares |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Emerging Markets Bond |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 26, 2018 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 11 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. IVV has data through Nov 6, 2026 and KHYB through Oct 26, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 8.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 28, 2018 to Oct 26, 2026 (8.3 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 8.1% for KHYB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -35.0% for KHYB. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.35. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while KHYB charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $69 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 9.54% for KHYB.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 505 holdings in IVV and 2 in KHYB, totalling 100.1% and 1.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 2 in KHYB, against full books of 1,018 and 69.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and KHYB you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or KHYB?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while KHYB charges 0.69%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $66 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, IVV or KHYB?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 8.1% for KHYB. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs KHYB -35.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and KHYB?
IVV and KHYB have a monthly-return correlation of 0.35, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or KHYB?
IVV yields 1.09% while KHYB yields 9.54%, so KHYB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is KHYB better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.