KMCA vs VXUS
PLUS Korea Manufacturing Core Alliance Index ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, KMCA or VXUS?
VXUS costs less.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KMCA | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $5M | $163.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.34% |
| Holdings | 73 | 8,844 |
| YTD Return | -19.86% | +10.00%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.01% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.55% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.55% |
| Fund Family | PLUS ETF | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 7, 2026 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
KMCA vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
KMCA vs VXUS Performance
PLUS Korea Manufacturing Core Alliance Index ETF (KMCA) is an ETF from PLUS ETF and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, KMCA is down 19.86% versus a gain of 10.00% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KMCA charges 0.65% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $5 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KMCA currently yields 0.00% against 2.34% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 88.3% of KMCA's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 91.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of KMCA is already inside VXUS. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
26 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in KMCA and 8,425 in VXUS, against full books of 73 and 8,844.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in KMCA | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005930:KRSamsung Electronics Co Ltd | 23.86% | 1.90% | 21.96% |
| 000660:KRSk Hynix Inc Common Stock KRW 5000 | 23.35% | 1.46% | 21.89% |
| 005380:KRHyundai Motor Co | 3.67% | 0.09% | 3.58% |
| 034020:KRDoosan Enerbility Co Ltd | 3.50% | 0.06% | 3.44% |
| 006400:KRSamsung Sdi Co Ltd | 3.14% | 0.05% | 3.09% |
| 373220:KRLg Energy Solution | 3.13% | 0.03% | 3.10% |
| 009150:KRSamsung Electro-Mechanics Co L | 2.45% | 0.13% | 2.32% |
| 353200:KRDaeduck Electronics Co Ltd | 2.37% | 0.01% | 2.36% |
| 108490:KRRobotis Ltd | 2.27% | 0.00% | 2.27% |
| 267260:KRHyundai Electric & Energy Systems | 2.17% | 0.03% | 2.14% |
88.3% of KMCA is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KMCA or VXUS?
KMCA has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $60 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between KMCA and VXUS?
At least 88.3% of KMCA's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 26 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in KMCA and 8,425 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, KMCA or VXUS?
KMCA yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.34%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than KMCA?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.