KPHO vs QQQ
KraneShares Dragon Capital Growth of Vietnam Index ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, KPHO or QQQ?
QQQ costs less.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KPHO | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.02% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $12M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 11.09% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 38 | 107 |
| YTD Return | -7.48% | +17.21%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +22.10% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.27% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.60% |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 3, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
KPHO vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
KPHO vs QQQ Performance
KraneShares Dragon Capital Growth of Vietnam Index ETF (KPHO) is an ETF from KraneShares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, KPHO is down 7.48% versus a gain of 17.21% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KPHO charges 1.02% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $102 vs $18 annually, a gap of $84 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KPHO currently yields 11.09% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 34 holdings in KPHO and 102 in QQQ, totalling 73.7% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in KPHO and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 38 and 107.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of KPHO and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KPHO or QQQ?
KPHO has an expense ratio of 1.02% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $84 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, KPHO or QQQ?
KPHO yields 11.09% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so KPHO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than KPHO?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.