KRBN vs VTI
KraneShares Global Carbon Strategy ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KRBN | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.90% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $139M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.04% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -3.89% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.56% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +0.71% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.31% | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.0% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -36.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 29, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
KRBN vs VTI Performance
KraneShares Global Carbon Strategy ETF (KRBN) is a ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KRBN returned +14.56% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, KRBN is down 3.89% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, KRBN compounded at +0.71% per year against +21.51% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +6.31% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, KRBN has the edge at +16.22% annualized vs +8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KRBN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.0% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.4% for KRBN and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.36. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KRBN charges 0.90% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $3 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KRBN currently yields 2.04% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
KRBN and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2785 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KRBN or VTI?
KRBN has an expense ratio of 0.90% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $87 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KRBN or VTI?
Over the past year KRBN returned +14.56% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), KRBN annualized +16.22% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KRBN or VTI?
KRBN has been the more volatile fund at 23.0% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: KRBN -36.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both KRBN and VTI?
KRBN and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.36, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KRBN and VTI?
KRBN and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2785 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KRBN or VTI?
KRBN yields 2.04% while VTI yields 1.07%, so KRBN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.