KRBN vs VTI
KraneShares Global Carbon Strategy ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, KRBN or VTI?
Energy against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KRBN | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.91% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $138M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.94% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 26 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -6.52% | +13.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.01% | +15.92%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.01% | +23.41%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.65% | +12.83%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.8% | 15.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -36.4% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,397 | $18,286Best |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Commodity | Equity |
| Style | Energy | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 29, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 30, 2020 to Oct 2, 2026 (6.2 years).
KRBN vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.2 years both funds cover.
KRBN vs VTI Performance
KraneShares Global Carbon Strategy ETF (KRBN) is an ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KRBN returned +3.01% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, KRBN is down 6.52% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Over three years, KRBN compounded at +2.01% per year against +23.41% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +2.65% and +12.83% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +15.88% annualized vs +15.32%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KRBN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.8% compared with 15.6% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.4% for KRBN and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.36. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KRBN charges 0.91% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $91 vs $3 annually, a gap of $88 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KRBN currently yields 1.94% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in KRBN and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 51.1% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, KRBN as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in KRBN and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 26 and 3,524.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of KRBN and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KRBN or VTI?
KRBN has an expense ratio of 0.91% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $88 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, KRBN or VTI?
Over the past year KRBN returned +3.01% vs +15.92% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), KRBN annualized +15.32% vs +15.88% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, KRBN or VTI?
KRBN has been the more volatile fund at 22.8% annualized versus 15.6% for VTI. Worst drawdown: KRBN -36.4% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both KRBN and VTI?
KRBN and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.36, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, KRBN or VTI?
KRBN yields 1.94% while VTI yields 1.03%, so KRBN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than KRBN?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.