KRBN vs VXUS
KRBN vs VXUS
KraneShares Global Carbon Strategy ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KRBN | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.90% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $139M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.04% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -3.44% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.29% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +1.24% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.10% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -36.4% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 29, 2020 | Jan 26, 2011 |
KRBN vs VXUS Performance
KraneShares Global Carbon Strategy ETF (KRBN) is a ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KRBN returned +15.29% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, KRBN is down 3.44% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, KRBN compounded at +1.24% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +6.10% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, KRBN has the edge at +16.36% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KRBN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.0% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.4% for KRBN and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.35. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KRBN charges 0.90% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $5 annually, a gap of $85 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KRBN currently yields 2.04% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
KRBN and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7863 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KRBN or VXUS?
KRBN has an expense ratio of 0.90% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $85 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KRBN or VXUS?
Over the past year KRBN returned +15.29% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), KRBN annualized +16.36% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KRBN or VXUS?
KRBN has been the more volatile fund at 23.0% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: KRBN -36.4% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both KRBN and VXUS?
KRBN and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.35, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KRBN and VXUS?
KRBN and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7863 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KRBN or VXUS?
KRBN yields 2.04% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.