KROP vs SCHD
Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KROP | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $9M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.11% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 34 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +14.57% | +25.58% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.52% | +31.06% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.07% | +15.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -12.01% | +9.61% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.1% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -62.0% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 12, 2021 | Oct 20, 2011 |
KROP vs SCHD Performance
Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year KROP returned +11.52% while SCHD returned +31.06%. Year to date, KROP is up 14.57% versus a gain of 25.58% for SCHD.
Over three years, KROP compounded at +2.07% per year against +15.55% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are -12.01% and +9.61% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.46% annualized vs -12.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KROP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.1% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.0% for KROP and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KROP charges 0.50% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $6 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KROP currently yields 2.11% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
KROP and SCHD share 1 holdings out of 129 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in KROP | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADM | 4.67% | 1.07% | 3.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KROP or SCHD?
KROP has an expense ratio of 0.50% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $44 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KROP or SCHD?
Over the past year KROP returned +11.52% vs +31.06% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), KROP annualized -12.14% vs +11.46% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KROP or SCHD?
KROP has been the more volatile fund at 22.1% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: KROP -62.0% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both KROP and SCHD?
KROP and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KROP and SCHD?
KROP and SCHD share 1 common holdings with a 1.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 129 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KROP or SCHD?
KROP yields 2.11% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.