IVV vs KROP
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | KROP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.50% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $9M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 2.11% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 34 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +14.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | +11.78% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | +2.13% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | -12.20% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 22.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -62.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Global X by mirae Asset | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 12, 2021 |
IVV vs KROP Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while KROP returned +11.78%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a gain of 14.79% for KROP.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.47% per year against +2.13% for KROP; over five years the annualized figures are +13.26% and -12.20% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.03% annualized vs -12.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KROP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -62.0% for KROP. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while KROP charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $50 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 2.11% for KROP.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and KROP share 3 holdings out of 532 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or KROP?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while KROP charges 0.50%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or KROP?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs +11.78% for KROP, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs -12.12% for KROP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or KROP?
KROP has been the more volatile fund at 22.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs KROP -62.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and KROP?
IVV and KROP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and KROP?
IVV and KROP share 3 common holdings with a 0.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 532 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or KROP?
IVV yields 1.09% while KROP yields 2.11%, so KROP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.