KTUP vs VYM

KTUP vs VYM

Which is better, KTUP or VYM?

Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns (1Y): VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricKTUPVYM
Expense Ratio1.50%0.04%Best
AUM$9M$81.6B
Dividend Yield8.16%2.22%
Holdings4613
YTD Return-79.27%+11.71%Best
1Y Return-82.13%+16.24%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+17.24%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.86%
Volatility (annualized)107.2%10.1%Best
Fund FamilyREX SharesVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleTrading-Leveraged EquityLarge Cap Value
InceptionSep 16, 2025Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

KTUP vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

KTUP vs VYM Performance

T-REX 2X Long KTOS Daily Target ETF (KTUP) is an ETF from REX Shares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KTUP returned -82.13% while VYM returned +16.24%. Year to date, KTUP is down 79.27% versus a gain of 11.71% for VYM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

KTUP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 107.2% compared with 10.1% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.26. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

KTUP charges 1.50% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $4 annually, a gap of $146 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KTUP currently yields 8.16% against 2.22% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 1 holding in KTUP and 557 in VYM, totalling 10.4% and 99.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in KTUP and 557 in VYM, against full books of 4 and 613.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of KTUP and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

KTUPVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, KTUP or VYM?

KTUP has an expense ratio of 1.50% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $146 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, KTUP or VYM?

Over the past year KTUP returned -82.13% vs +16.24% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, KTUP or VYM?

KTUP has been the more volatile fund at 107.2% annualized versus 10.1% for VYM.

Should I hold both KTUP and VYM?

KTUP and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.26, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, KTUP or VYM?

KTUP yields 8.16% while VYM yields 2.22%, so KTUP currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than KTUP?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.