KWEB vs VTI
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KWEB | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $5.4B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.43% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 34 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -24.84% | +13.38% | |
| 1Y Return | -24.26% | +21.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.51% | +21.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -6.84% | +12.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 33.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -80.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 31, 2013 | May 24, 2001 |
KWEB vs VTI Performance
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) is a ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KWEB returned -24.26% while VTI returned +21.12%. Year to date, KWEB is down 24.84% versus a gain of 13.38% for VTI.
Over three years, KWEB compounded at +3.51% per year against +21.85% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -6.84% and +12.44% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.10% annualized vs +2.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KWEB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -80.9% for KWEB and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.30. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KWEB charges 0.69% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $3 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KWEB currently yields 7.43% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
KWEB and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2818 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KWEB or VTI?
KWEB has an expense ratio of 0.69% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $66 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KWEB or VTI?
Over the past year KWEB returned -24.26% vs +21.12% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), KWEB annualized +2.11% vs +8.10% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KWEB or VTI?
KWEB has been the more volatile fund at 33.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: KWEB -80.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both KWEB and VTI?
KWEB and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.30, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KWEB and VTI?
KWEB and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2818 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KWEB or VTI?
KWEB yields 7.43% while VTI yields 1.07%, so KWEB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.