KWEB vs VXUS
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, KWEB or VXUS?
VXUS has been ahead.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KWEB | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $5.2B | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 7.43% | 2.59% |
| Holdings | 34 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | -26.89% | +16.15%Best |
| 1Y Return | -27.16% | +27.58%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +0.21% | +20.48%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -10.68% | +9.09%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 33.5% | 14.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -80.9% | -39.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $5,685 | $15,450Best |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 31, 2013 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 1, 2013 to Sep 4, 2026 (13.1 years).
KWEB vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 13.1 years both funds cover.
KWEB vs VXUS Performance
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) is an ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KWEB returned -27.16% while VXUS returned +27.58%. Year to date, KWEB is down 26.89% versus a gain of 16.15% for VXUS.
Over three years, KWEB compounded at +0.21% per year against +20.48% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are -10.68% and +9.09% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +6.05% annualized vs +1.88%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KWEB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.5% compared with 14.5% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -80.9% for KWEB and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KWEB charges 0.69% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $5 annually, a gap of $64 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KWEB currently yields 7.43% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 53.4% of KWEB's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 87.7% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
17 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in KWEB and 8,094 in VXUS, against full books of 34 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in KWEB | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9988:HKAlibaba Group Holding Limited Ordinary Shares | 8.94% | 0.49% | 8.45% |
| PDD:IEPdd Holdings Inc | 8.22% | 0.13% | 8.09% |
| 3690:SHMeituan Dianping | 8.04% | 0.11% | 7.93% |
| YMM:SHFull Truck A-Adr | 4.17% | 0.01% | 4.16% |
| 6618:HKJD Health International, Inc. | 3.65% | 0.01% | 3.64% |
| 1024:HKKuaishou Technology | 3.58% | 0.03% | 3.55% |
| 9626:HKBilibili Inc (China) | 3.38% | 0.01% | 3.37% |
| TAL:SHTal Education Group | 3.25% | 0.01% | 3.24% |
| 3888:HKKingsoft Corp Ltd | 2.28% | 0.01% | 2.27% |
| 241:HKAlibaba Health Information Technology Limited Shs | 1.59% | 0.01% | 1.58% |
53.4% of KWEB is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KWEB or VXUS?
KWEB has an expense ratio of 0.69% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $64 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, KWEB or VXUS?
Over the past year KWEB returned -27.16% vs +27.58% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), KWEB annualized +1.88% vs +6.05% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, KWEB or VXUS?
KWEB has been the more volatile fund at 33.5% annualized versus 14.5% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: KWEB -80.9% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both KWEB and VXUS?
KWEB and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between KWEB and VXUS?
At least 53.4% of KWEB's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in KWEB and 8,094 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, KWEB or VXUS?
KWEB yields 7.43% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so KWEB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than KWEB?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.