KYN vs QQQ
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, Inc. vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. KYN delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KYN | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 10.00% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $3.8B | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.18% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 36 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +24.23% | +19.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.52% | +26.75% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +29.10% | +26.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +23.49% | +15.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.2% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -95.1% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 28, 2004 | Mar 10, 1999 |
KYN vs QQQ Performance
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (KYN) is a ETF from Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year KYN returned +28.52% while QQQ returned +26.75%. Year to date, KYN is up 24.23% versus a gain of 19.68% for QQQ.
Over three years, KYN compounded at +29.10% per year against +26.25% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +23.49% and +15.39% respectively. Across the full 22-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.15% annualized vs -0.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 30.2% for KYN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -95.1% for KYN and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.36. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KYN charges 10.00% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $1000 vs $18 annually, a gap of $982 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KYN currently yields 6.18% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KYN or QQQ?
KYN has an expense ratio of 10.00% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $982 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KYN or QQQ?
Over the past year KYN returned +28.52% vs +26.75% for QQQ, so KYN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (22 years), KYN annualized -0.24% vs +13.15% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KYN or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 30.2% for KYN. Worst drawdown: KYN -95.1% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both KYN and QQQ?
KYN and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.36, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KYN and QQQ?
KYN and QQQ share 2 common holdings with a 1.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 124 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KYN or QQQ?
KYN yields 6.18% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so KYN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.